"Principalship: Leading bend in Schools

Added by Seo Expert 10 months ago

The L.E.A.D.E.R. Way


In June 1997,the Prime Minister of Singapore unveiled the Government's vision of 'Thinking Schools, Learning Nation' (TSLN). This vision was forged to combine Singapore's education system in the vivacious of the quick changes a propos the world. The running foresees that Singapore, once its limited natural resources, can only continue to take forward by nurturing a knowledgeable workforce that is flexible to the changes in the world economy. More importantly, the giving out realized that it had to begin preparing the nation for these inevitable changes by revamping the education system in accordance later the vision of TSLN.

The Ministry of Education (MOE) in Singapore, the let pass agency liable for the pretense of this vision, states the goals of TSLN as follows:

Thinking Schools ensure that we equip students behind skills and knowledge and values and instincts to perspective cutting edge challenges, while Learning Nation aims to publicize a culture of continual learning greater than the assistant professor environment. (MOE, 1998,p.16)

In order to accomplish the vision, the MOE has introduced changes to the curriculum, the training of teachers, assessment modes and the evolve of resource packages. Furthermore, all schools will have students spending at least 30% of their curriculum grow old accessing electronic resources and on the go on computers. (MOE, 1998,p.17) The changes in the curriculum swell the infusion of thinking skills and the narrowing in the contents of the curriculum. Schools are strongly encouraged to set up their own thinking programs and teachers are to enroll in courses to learn how to infuse thinking skills in their teaching.

With the restructuring taking place to do the vision, most teachers clock radio that the changes will problem them by increasing their already-heavy workload and tight get older schedule due to increased training hours. The principal, innate the main disseminator of the MOE's mission of TSLN in the school, has the unenviable task to articulate this vision to overcome the resistance to the changes especially from the school's teachers.

The main endeavor of the paper is to scrutinize the perceptions of teachers as to the effectiveness of principals in leading a correct programs (in this case, a Thinking Programs). since teachers are directly responsible for the learning outcomes of the students, their perceptions of their principals' effectiveness and concomitant endeavors are indispensable to the feat of the vision of TSLN. As allowance of the paper, a combat scrutiny of a primary school, which has embarked on a Thinking Programs, has been carried out.


In the hope of improving the existing system, schools perspective many problems following introducing well-meaning changes. Restructuring would, inevitably, put on people within the organisation to occupy new ideas and ideals that usually consequences in many uncertainties (Heckman, 1990). A school's principal, thus, has the uphill task to manage the level of resistance to correct and align the staff to put it on towards a common vision, amidst the turbulence.

To reiterate, the author is focussing on teachers' perceptions of their principal in leading change, more specifically, the process of creating a Thinking Programme for the school. The importance of teachers' sharpness of their leaders in the realization of a scholastic has been documented in various researches. Researchers (such as Bhella, 1992) suggested that teachers' morale is related to student achievement. And, in turn, the principal has the strongest upset on teachers' satisfaction in the workplace. (Vanderstoepe et al, 1994) From that perspective, the teachers' satisfaction and perceptions of the principal in leading the correct process would directly have an impact upon the finishing rate of the further programme of boosting students' achievement.

In the process of writing, the author discussed as soon as many teachers on what they expect their leaders to get when introducing a extra programs to their schools. The author has summarized the teachers' opinions for inclusion in this paper. Previous research and literature would be used to illuminate the factors that are indispensable to the triumph of a principal in leading a alter programs. To extra increase clarity of exposition, I have presented logically the ideas encapsulated in previous research by using the acronym of L.E.A.D.E.R as a model to elucidate the steps in leading a successful correct programs in a school. The acronym of L.E.A.D.E.R stands for:

Leading by example

Empowering vision

Adaptive change

Developing people

Evaluating the system


The above model does not try to be prescriptive or try to imply that it will lid every the salient factors of an lively alter programme. Due to the prescribed length of the paper, the author hopes that the model will shed more buoyant in the subject of research in a more questioning manner.

Leading by Example

In most organisations that have embarked on a modify programme, one of the more common complaints by the employees is that the leader does not 'walk the talk'. In a school, if a principal is not delightful to learn and adjust to changes, there are no compelling reasons for the staff to accomplish so. The Scout's motto, ' lead by Example', is a major criteria of what a principal must reach to succeed in leading change.

In order to create a thinking and learning organisation, principal will become researchers and designers rather than controllers and overseers. They should as a consequence be a model of learning to the perch of the organisation and urge on the staff to be life-long learners. (Senge, 1990) More importantly, a principal must not merely communicate in words, but by goings-on to persuade the staff that the alter is taking place at all levels. These build a suitability of esprit de corp in the studious that will urge on in reduction the pressures that modify brings to organisations.

In short, a principal has to be perceived to be adept in leading intellectual instructor press on by his or her own example. (Dunning, 1993; McHugh & McMullan, 1995) Unless the staffs are convinced, they will not perform co-operatively towards the endowment of the bend programme.

Empowering Vision

A tweak programme requires a change of vision. According to Kotter (1995, p.10),

"" A vision says something that clarifies the organization in which an organisation needs to move.""

The Ministry of Education developed the vision of TSLN in the center of 1997. In the schools, banners are put happening to proclaim the vision of TSLN and speculative principals were conventional to align the teachers towards this shared vision for the betterment of the schools. The principals are standard to amend culture through capacity in communication of the essential shared values for a tainted vision. (Campbell-Evans, 1993).

Adaptive Change

In most organisations' fine-tune programme, the occupy pace of fiddle with is often ignored. Most leaders are interested to see results and therefore apply unwarranted pressures on those involved in the process .In Singapore schools; such a event is a commonplace. past the MOE's set sights on of creating a world-class studious system in Singapore, many other initiatives are introduced within a short get older of time. Most of the initiatives will require much get older and effort of the teachers, on top of their already-heavy load. Such a business often causes concern and the principal has to habitat the issues.

A good leader, therefore, must be skilled of flexible the move by sequencing and pacing the perform required of the amend process. Unfortunately, this is not the battle in most correct programme. Most leaders begin other initiatives without stopping supplementary events or they start too many initiatives at the similar time. They crush and disorient the extremely people who need to agree to answerability for the work. (Heifetz & Laurie, 1997,p.180)

Developing People

The people who are directly committed in a change programme have to be suitably trained to meet the challenges. A good principal would ensure that the staff's potential is developed for many reasons. Firstly, if the staffs are not trained with ease to recognize the new responsibilities of the initiative, the programme will not be a success. Secondly, a principal who develops and empowers the staff in the concerned bend programme will be more practiced to persuade them to commit to it. By show so, a principal can excite leadership by sharing leadership past the staff in the school. Through empowering others, the principal can as a consequence revere his/her status and power. (Blas, 1987)

A principal can furthermore fabricate the staff potential by initiation stirring channels of communication within the school. atmosphere stirring committees and encouraging peer learning could get this. external agencies past ability in the areas of tweak can also be consulted to incite smoothen the process of change.

A principal who is a people developer would help as "" solutions to adaptive challenges reside not in the management suite but in the amassed shrewdness of employees at every levels.""(Heifetz & Laurie, 1997,p.173) Thus, by show so, the principal would have increased the level of expertise of the new initiative and with the hearts of his/her followers.

Evaluating the System

The principal must for eternity monitor the process of a new theoretical initiative. The initial eagerness that has been built up the principal may wane due to the deficiency of a fine review system .An effective review system would allow the principal to see the flaws and to refine the programme due to shifting circumstances. A fine evaluation system for a thinking programme would consist of classroom remarks on the teaching of the thinking tools and feedback from those who are committed in the modify process. This includes the teachers, pupils and their parents. This is important as constant feedback allows the principal to refine the programme due to changing circumstances. (Hargreaves, 1995)

To supplementary append the evaluative aspect of the programme, the principal could brainstorm in the same way as the staff on the criteria of what are considered to be desired outcomes of the new initiatives. To be more specific, an in force alter leader would spell out what are the brusque and long-term desired results of the programme and base the evaluations upon such targets. The evaluative process must be realizable and fair by including seize get older frames for achieving them. This would dispel by the side of the fears of the teachers and to ensure that they would not resort to cosmetic trial in the process of change.

A principal must with be self-reflective and be competent to give a positive response criticism if the programme is not distressing according to plan. He or she must rely on the teachers who are directly in action behind the pupils to have enough money honest feedback. Though, this may lift questions of the credibility of the principal's initial plans, a good head would allow the subordinates to lessening them for other improvements to a extra initiative. This is especially consequently if the head is seeking to make a thinking and learning organisation.


An vigorous review system would as well as be used to ensure the continuing press forward of a modify programme. Most fiddle with programmes may start out spiritedly but they usually lose steam at the end. The achievement to preserve the initial eagerness and duty to the vision is, thus, an important criterion of an functioning principal. He or she must be accomplished to recharge the immersion of the teachers by for eternity reminding them and encouraging them to accomplish desired outcomes. In a thinking programme, a principal could hold monthly meetings to talk virtually the increase and to share exploit stories of the programme to preserve the assimilation of the teachers. If the assimilation and zeal of the staff to the initiatives can be maintained throughout, more change programmes will be successful in schools.


During the process of writing this paper, the author felt that positive issues should be addressed. One of the main problems seems to lie in the pacing of new initiatives introduced by the Ministry of Education. Due to this, a principal is stretched for time and effort in juggling taking into account the new initiatives. This, as shown in the charge study, usually leads to additional good teacher programmes going through a roller-coaster ride of enthusiasm. The principal would later resort to cosmetic efforts to persuade the parents, visitors and the Ministry that a programme is in place as in this warfare study. The author hopes that this is just an only combat but feels the Ministry should truly see into the thing of whether principals are overloaded next the projects in development before launching into marginal initiative.

Another situation united to the above is the habit to add up the evaluation and appraisal methods of the principals by the Ministry. At present, the review tends to be inaccurate, as the Ministry does not in fact know the inner workings of the school. There should be a 360 degrees Feedback Survey whereby the staff (especially the teachers); pupils and parents are to question the effectiveness of the principal in leading a programme. It may be considered time-consuming but it will ensure that principals get not forward cosmetic trial to hide weaknesses of any extra programmes. This with allows schools to be opened to ideas and suggestions for supplementary refinements of the programme. In this way, the Ministry will have a more accurate characterize whether the initiatives that had been introduced are articulated in a proper manner.

The author reiterates that the realization of leading a amend programme in schools is largely dependent on the principal's achievement to put on the perceptions of the teachers. Trust, thus, is an important ingredient that has to be built going on by the principal, as the principal-teachers connection will have an impact upon supplementary higher initiatives. The paper has also included a self-evaluation questionnaire (Appendix 3) for principals who are in the process of leading a modify programme in their schools. In closing, the author wants to emphasise that in order to reap the full benefits, a change programme should be nurtured and not enforced.

Dr.Alvin Chan is an press on Research Specialist in Asia. He has consulted for and aid in the build up of managerial innovations and in action learning methodologies in several organizations School management system Singapore"

Replies (5)

RE: "Principalship: Leading bend in Schools - Added by Seo Expert 10 months ago

Packers and Movers Noida Keep up the great work, I read few posts on this website and I think that your web blog is real interesting and has got sectors of fantastic information.

RE: "Principalship: Leading bend in Schools - Added by Kavya Arora 10 months ago

I as of overdue went over your weblog and have been perusing alongside. I figured I would depart with my first announcement. I do now not have the foggiest concept of what to say aside from that I in truth have preferred perusing. Decent weblog. I will keep going to this blog all of the time.
Get Full Sensual Satisfaction From Gurgaon Escorts » Social Networking Community (
Take Call Girls in Gurgaon and Get Full Orgasm » Social Networking Community (

RE: "Principalship: Leading bend in Schools - Added by xyzz sdfl 9 months ago

it's truly wonderful weblog. it's realy educational along with a this type of great work. i really like this particular. <a href="">Packers and Movers Bangalore to Gurgaon</a>

RE: "Principalship: Leading bend in Schools - Added by xyzz sdfl 9 months ago

Packers and Movers Bangalore to Gurgaon it's truly wonderful weblog. it's realy educational along with a this type of great work. i really like this particular.